Do You Believe the News on Social Media? Only If It's Presented By Someone Who Shares Your Views

We've all heard about how fake news is spread more quickly than news that is legitimate.  But did you also know that we perceive bias in certain neutral stories, depending on who is posting it?

 Turns out news stories are perceived as biased based on who shares that story on social media, regardless if the actual story is biased.  Researchers call it  "hostile media."  A new study also examines how Republicans and Democrats perceive bias of a news story differently depending on how many followers a Twitter account has.
“Readers are inclined to believe that news content is unbiased, or less biased, when they share the same partisan affiliation as the source sharing the story than they are when the source does not share their perspective,” says Tae Kyoung Lee, lead author and assistant professor of communication at the University of Utah at newswise.com.
To expand upon previous studies about the hostile media effect – which occurs when a neutral news story is perceived as biased against an individual’s own viewpoint – researchers examined its impact in social media. Previous studies on hostile media effect have focused on traditional media and the sources who produce news content.
"About 62 percent of U.S. adults get news on social media, such as Reddit, Facebook and Twitter. Much of this content does not come directly from a traditional news source, but rather from an individual user who is sharing it with their social media friends and followers,”points out Lee.  
Researchers pursued two questions in the study, according to newswise.com. First, does an ostensibly neutral story shared via a partisan social media user produce hostile media effect? Second, do overt signals about the potential size of the audience affect the hostile media effect?
To answer these questions, an online experiment was conducted where Republicans and Democrats viewed a Twitter account, in which the user was presented as a Republican or Democrat with either 21 or 503,000 followers. Then, the research subjects read a news article shared by the Twitter user, which was published by a neutral news source, The Associated Press. 
Consistent with the hostile media effect, both Republicans and Democrats believed that a news article shared by a Twitter user from an opposing political party was more biased than one shared by a Twitter user from the same political party. However, this effect was more prominent among Republicans than Democrats. As the Twitter account had more followers, this effect was also more prominent among Republicans.
“The different pattern between Republicans and Democrats might be due to their different interpretation of the large number of Twitter followers. That is, Democrats seem to believe that the Twitter account with many followers is a more credible source and the article shared by it is less biased. Republicans seem to believe that more followers mean more bias,” said Lee.
Researchers conclude that the hostile media effect, which has been widely studied in traditional media, can be shown in social media, and those who share the news article can influence the hostile media effect among partisans.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ever Make a Bad Choice? Make it Worse by Rationalizing It?

I knew it was probably a risky thing to do.  But I hadn't been paid, and kept getting the runaround, so when I went over my boss's head, and his boss told me he'd look into it the following week, what I'd been hearing all along, I kind of went a little nuts and said, "Please don't take this the wrong way but I feel like I'm getting the runaround again." And, poof!  They fired me. So how do we talk ourselves into rationalizing bad choices ? I had every right to get paid.  But most likely I should have known the guy had a thin skin and I should have been more careful.  Even my son, 16 at the time, told me I should have not done it. "When a reward is tempting enough, people will break their own moral codes to gain the desired prize," says newswise.com. "Afterward, they’ll tell you exactly how they were justified: 'It wasn’t as if anyone was harmed,' “I was only borrowing …,” 'My boss told me too,' or 'It’s our ...
Read more

Happy? Stay Away From Others, Say Experts

This may sound very strange but a new study says people protect their good moods to stay safe. What's that again? " Once happy, steer clear of choices that could invite in negative feelings," says newswise.com, quoting  Heath Demaree , professor and chair of the  Department of Psychological Sciences  in the  College of Arts and Sciences  at Case Western Reserve. “They wonder: How much better does it get? If you’re already happy, why risk making your mood worse?” says Demaree, co-author of the study, published in the journal  Frontiers of Psychology . “Essentially, it’s quitting while you’re ahead.” "The findings differ from some previous research, which has shown that a person’s risk-taking increases after they’ve become successful—known as the 'house money' theory. Still, other studies suggest that people risk more when they’re losing, hoping to break even," newswise writes. I don't know about you but when I'm happy, I want to shar...
Read more

Does the 'Nudge Factor' Influence Your Decision-Making?

I'm not much of a gambler.    Because it has had quite a negative impact on my family (my grandfather went to jail for it back in the 1920's), I've stayed away from it. But now a new study suggests why some people hold them, and others fold 'em. Why do people make high-risk choices – not only in casinos, but also in other aspects of their lives – even when they know the odds are stacked against them? A team led by a Johns Hopkins biomedical engineer has researched why some people make high-risk choices – not only in casinos, but also in other aspects of their lives – even when they know the odds are stacked against them, according to newswise.com. Scientists found that "the decision to 'up the ante ' even in the face of long odds is the result of an internal bias that adds up over time and involves a 'push-pull' dynamic between the brain’s two hemispheres ," the web site reports. Whether you are suffering from a losing streak or rid...
Read more